The Department of Justice (DOJ) on Dec. 19 released thousands of pages of records related to the late financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, meeting a 30-day disclosure deadline established by a newly enacted transparency law.

The DOJ published the materials on a new “Epstein Library” section of its website, organizing them into categories that include court records, prior DOJ disclosures, Freedom of Information Act responses, and materials previously shared with the House Oversight Committee. The documents and images are heavily redacted. 

Former President Bill Clinton appears in several of the images, including one photograph showing him in a hot tub with an individual whose face is not visible. Another image shows Clinton swimming in a pool with Epstein’s longtime associate Ghislaine Maxwell, who is serving a 20-year prison sentence.

Some photographs show other well-known public figures, including Michael Jackson, Mick Jagger, and former Prince Andrew. The images do not show evidence of criminal activity.

According to a review by the New York Times, President Donald Trump is rarely mentioned in the release, with only scattered references and images, most of which were already public. 

In an earlier Dec. 12 release of a small batch of photographs by House Democrats on the Oversight Committee, Trump, Clinton, Trump’s former chief strategist Steve Bannon, Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates, and others were pictured alongside Epstein. The White House criticized that release as politically motivated and said it was intended to create a false narrative.

The Times reported that much of the newly released material stems from three prior investigations into Epstein: A 2005 inquiry launched by police in Palm Beach, Florida, a federal investigation in Florida that concluded in 2008, and a final probe by federal prosecutors in Manhattan in 2019 that ended when Epstein died in jail before the case could be resolved. 

The disclosures come under the Epstein Files Transparency Act, a bipartisan measure that Congress passed nearly unanimously in November. Rep. Clay Higgins, R-La., was the only “no” vote in either chamber. Trump, who has previously taken varying public positions on the release of Epstein-related files, signed the legislation into law Nov. 29.

The law requires the U.S. attorney general to release all non-exempt Epstein-related files within 30 days of enactment in a publicly searchable format. It allows redactions to protect victims and permits the DOJ to withhold limited information related to ongoing investigations, law enforcement methods, grand jury secrecy, or national security. 

Attorney General Pam Bondi must submit a report by Jan. 3 summarizing the redactions made and outlining their legal basis, according to the New York Post.

Several lawmakers quickly questioned whether the Dec. 19 release satisfies the statute’s requirements. Rep. Robert Garcia of California, the top Democrat on the Oversight Committee, argued on X that “it’s clear that this is not a full release.”

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., called on the DOJ to release additional information, criticizing what he framed as extensive redactions. 

“Simply releasing a mountain of blacked out pages violates the spirit of transparency and the letter of the law,” he said in a statement cited by the Times. 

Earlier on Dec. 19, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche told FOX News’ “Fox and Friends” that the DOJ planned to release “several hundred thousand documents today” and would publish additional materials in the coming weeks to allow for victim-related redactions. 

“We are looking at every single piece of paper that we are going to produce, making sure that every victim — their name, their identity, their story — to the extent it needs to be protected, is completely protected,” Blanche said. “And so I expect that we’re going to release more documents over the next couple of weeks.”

In a letter to Congress, Blanche said the DOJ would need roughly two additional weeks to review other documents for potential release, FOX News reported. He added that the files identify more than 1,200 victims and family members.

Ahead of the release, House Democrats on the Oversight Committee criticized the DOJ over reports it would roll out the disclosures in phases. In a statement, the lawmakers accused the administration of falling short of the law’s requirements and said they are “now examining all legal options in the face of this violation of federal law.”

The DOJ rejected claims that it failed to comply with the statute, arguing that it met the deadline while prioritizing survivor protections.

“The DOJ is releasing a massive tranche of new documents that the Biden and Obama administrations refused to release. The story here: the Trump administration is providing levels of transparency that prior administrations never even contemplated,” the department's public affairs office stated on X before the files went live. “The initial deadline is being met as we work diligently to protect victims.”

Republican Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky, who led the discharge petition to force a House vote on the transparency legislation, released a 14-minute video Dec. 18 outlining his expectations for the disclosure. 

Massie said he spoke with attorneys representing Epstein’s victims, who told him they believe “there are at least 20 names of men who are accused of sex crimes in the possession of the FBI.” 

“If we get a large production on Dec. 19 and it does not contain a single name of any male who is accused of a sex crime or sex trafficking or rape, then we know they haven’t produced all the documents,” Massie said. He added that the names would reside in FBI FD-302 interview forms.

In a statement released after the DOJ release Dec. 19, Massie said the disclosure “grossly fails to comply with both the spirit and the letter of the law.”